6 Impact on staffing and collaboration
This section reports on the findings relating to the impact of
networked learning on staffing and collaboration. Networked learning
has led to a number of changes both in terms of changes to existing
roles of staff and to the creation of new roles and new members
of staff being appointed. For some staff although there has been
no official change in their role, the nature of the work they carry
out has changed.
6.4 Research
Issues around research did not feature to any great
extent in the interviews as shown in Figure 6-7 below. This is
likely to
be because the overall emphasis of the study was on the impact
of networked learning on management and administrative processes.
None of the FE institutions, or H3, commented on the impact of
networked learning on research, and these institutions are omitted
from Figure 6-7. Of the FE colleges, only F2 and F10 commented
on research into networked learning; and only four of the HE institutions
mentioned this as a focus of research.
As can be seen form the data, there is a distinct
difference between the HE and FE responses in terms of the importance
they attached
to research. It is also noteworthy that issues about tensions between
research and teaching and ‘supremacy’ of research are
most apparent in research led institutions (H1, H4, H5 and H6).
It is interesting that the main mention of research into networked
learning (ie as the focus of the research) and its impact on learning
comes from teaching led HEIs (H2, H7 and H8; although H5 also engages
in research into networked learning) and that two of the FE colleges
were interested in or involved with research into networked learning.
In the case of F10, this research was in collaboration with a University.
A key issue in terms of development of networked learning, especially
for research led institutions, would seem to be the impact that
research activities will have on the availability of academics
prepared to give up research time to engage in development in what
is a ‘teaching’ activity.
| CS |
Comments on the impact of networked learning on research |
Research into networked learning |
| H1 |
Limited mention of the conflict between teaching and research
within an institution that is research led. |
Not commented on. |
| H2 |
Limited mention of emphasis placed on research achievements
at the expense of teaching achievements in spite of university
being teaching led. |
Some mention of research into networked learning. |
| H4 |
Limited mention of the conflict between teaching and research
within an institution that is research led; although they are
trying to redress this through offering incentives for teaching. |
Not commented on. |
| H5 |
One respondent was concerned about the tension between research
and teaching, and wondered, given the competing pressures on
time; staff in a research led university would find the time
to develop Networked Learning skills. |
Research into networked learning was noted. |
| H6 |
Considerable emphasis from several respondents on research
and its impact teaching. |
Not commented on. |
| H7 |
Not commented on. |
Some mention of research into networked learning. |
| H8 |
Not commented on. |
Research group which focuses on networked learning has led
to publications etc. |
| H10 |
One respondent noted pressure of research impacting on teaching. |
Not commented on. |
| F2 |
Not commented on. |
Limited mention of desire to conduct research into technical
infrastructure for networked learning. |
| F10 |
Not commented on. |
Some mention of research into networked learning. |
Figure 6 7: Impact of networked learning on research
(interview data)
|