Institution H6
6 Impact of networked learning on infrastructure and support services
The infrastructure in relation to networked learning
requires examination of both the technological aspects of networked
learning and also the support that is required by both staff and
students.
Technology
The technological aspects that were identified by
the participants in this study explored issues in relation to the
robustness of the
system, the interoperability of the managed learning environment
(MLE), technological support, and centralisation of the services.
Robustness and security
Issues around robustness did not feature strongly
in the interviews. However two respondents noted that the technical
support had improved
after some early technical problems with the VLE.
I think probably some of the basic technical problems
have become better, but technical limitations then reveal themselves
and, for
example, we don’t have a stream video capacity... (H6I4)
I think maybe... yes it was last year, [the VLE] did
crash a few times because really it just wasn’t being maintained so it
just got completely overloaded but we now have proper technicians
and very good technical support but that was a real battle actually… it
was not being maintained on the server... (H6I2)
and by another that these systems were becoming mission
critical before the institution realised it:
…
well I can sort of give you a couple of examples where we have had
say technical problems with the [the VLE] system and the system has
failed for whatever reason... the fact that people are become more
dependent on these systems and we don’t necessarily realise
that they are becoming dependent on it so they are expecting that
these systems will be there at a particular time and we don’t
realise that they are expecting that... I fully expect that these
sort of things will become much more what you would call critical
services that need to be there day in and day out, properly supported
and so there are problems if they are not there day in and day out.
(H6I5)
The suggestion here is of a system that is reasonably
robust but which is under increasing pressure as networked learning
is expanding
within the institution. Other members of staff did not mention
problems of system failures or breakdown.
Interoperability of the MLE
Issues surrounding interoperability are noted above
in terms of the requirement for funding to keep all parts of the
institution functioning
at the same level. The integration of the VLE with the student
information system, which is currently happening, was commented on:
Originally [the VLE] was on its own… We are just upgrading
to a new version of [the VLE] and building links so that student
registration information can flow from the one system to the other
so that is happening now. (H6I5)
…
we are just upgrading [the VLE] and we are integrating [it] with
our student information system, for that to be successful... there
has to be a complete change of process because at the moment many
departments don’t use that student information system in the
way that you would have an up to date list of students at the beginning
of term. They are... actually you can only get an accurate list of
students from departments just before exams because it is used for
exam timetabling... (H6I2)
The integration of information across different systems
that interoperability offers is thus new to the institution. It was
noted that the development
of the new portal also depended on interoperability with the student
information system and the information being timely and up-to-date:
…
well, for the portal to be a success… it relies on the student
information system being up to date... (H6I2)
Centralisation of services
It was acknowledged that one important impact of networked
learning so far was in relation to the adoption of the VLE:
Quite significant in a way that what we do here is
essentially we provide the central IT infrastructure for the University
so we provide
the data networks, all the central computing facilities, email,
the web, corporate systems and so on so in my area I have got teams
of
people who are there to provide those services... (H6I5)
In addition, another member of staff stated that the
university wide use of the VLE provided a more coherent and consistent
approach to
networked learning.
However, it is worth noting that whilst the provision
of a centrally managed VLE potentially provides a university consistent
approach
to the development of networked learning, in practice this may
not happen:
I mean for example, I was in the department of […] this morning
and they don’t use [the VLE] and they can’t see any need
for it but they have their own website and students use that and
students I mean they use email to communicate with each other but
they would be able to pick up things online and so on so you have
many departments who develop their own facilities in that way so
there will be quite some variation in approach there. (H6I5)
This indicates that technology is being used to support
learning; however, it is tailored to an individual department’s perceived
need.
Support
The technological side of the institutional infrastructure
is vital for the effective development of networked learning but
it is not
sufficient on its own. Staff development, support for students
and adequate library and learning resources are also needed.
Staff training
The availability of centrally organised training was
commented on but it was also recognised the uptake of this training
was patchy:
…
they are all voluntary though, the courses are put on and people
have to sign up for them, of course the vast majority don’t
sign up. (H6I3)
... there are various training courses that […] already do
some training, some training happens here... (H6I5)
Support for staff
In addition to staff training other support includes
ensuring the availability of computers, with every member of staff
having their
own computer. Technical support for those using the VLE is available
from the central support unit and departmental IT support is also
available.
If it is a technology problem then typically departments
have their own IT support staff… if it is things to do with accessing
particular sorts of information, then again it depends on what it
is. I mean if it is something that is in [the VLE] then they might
go to the staff tutor... if it is do with say library resources they
may well go to one of the subject librarians in the library and if
it is a technical issue then that would come back to our library
systems people so you tend get different levels of support from people
who are experts in different areas so it is quite a complicated matrix
there of who knows about what. (H6I5)
In addition support for staff comes in terms of funding
(as mentioned in Section 5 under incentives, p16).
This section suggests that the view of the respondents
is that the infrastructure in the institution is reasonably robust,
it has improved,
and support for staff is available both in terms of technology
and staff development. Students are supported in a range of ways
and
this support is increasingly targeted as can be seen below.
Support for students
There are a range of support mechanisms for students.
Training is available based on a survey of all incoming students.
We started off just with students in Arts and Social
Sciences... many of them said that they were confident of their abilities,
a
few months down the line... they [found] they weren’t as adept
as they thought they were… we are running targeted ICT training...
So we are trying to target the training more to their needs and we
are going to extend that so that we actually give them study skills
training and different types of training on entry and we are going
to begin to link that with progress files... (H6I6)
Library and learning resources
One area that networked learning has had an impact
on is the library and learning resources; however, as in other areas
the impact may
not be uniform across the whole service:
In the area of networked learning, I suspect that
it happens, the push comes from either side [academic or library]
and you might get
a subject librarian who is very keen on online resources and they
will be talking to the library committee or academics... In other
cases it will be individual staff or departments who will make
demands and will want to know what is available and to have resources
either
available or integrated into [the VLE] or whatever. (H6I4)
Questionnaire data
In the main the questionnaire data supports the views
from the interview data in that minor changes in the infrastructure
are noted. The only
exception is that the introduction of the VLE across the university
is seen as a major change by one respondent as is the introduction
of online journals by another. Notably the questionnaire from the
IT member of staff was not returned, the perception of those providing
the IT support suggests a different view indicating that the changes
are seen as significant. This is corroborated with documentary
evidence that suggests an increasing emphasis on the technological
infrastructure
and a commitment to ensuring that students are equipped to deal
with, and use the technology for teaching and learning and this commitment
is noted by the interviewees.
Summary
In the view of the respondents the infrastructure
in the institution is sufficiently robust and has improved, and support
for staff is
available both in terms of technology and staff development. Students
are supported in a range of ways and this support is increasingly
targeted at those requiring the greatest level of support. The
majority of respondents suggested that changes in the infrastructure
have
been minor; however, this view was not held by the technical staff
who see the changes as major. Documentary evidence suggests an
increasing emphasis on the technological infrastructure and demonstrates
a commitment
to ensuring that students are equipped to deal with, and use the
technology for teaching and learning and this commitment is noted
by the interviewees.
|